MUMBAI: Nearly three-fourths of the insurance companies operating in the country are 'capital surplus', ie, they do not need any fresh capital.Hence, the government's decision to raise the foreign direct investment (FDI) limit in the insurance sector will help many local partners who plan to sell their stake rather than sell new shares, which would have led to cash flowing into the company
The Cabinet, through an Ordinance, has raised the FDI limit in insurance to 49%, recommending a composite cap of 49%, which would include all forms of foreign direct investments and foreign portfolio investments
This move will help local partners to make money hand-over-fist as there is likely to be more secondary stake sale.
"There will be a secondary deal if the company has surplus solvency and money will flow into the Indian promoter," said Abizer Diwanji, national head financial services, EY. "It will depend on the preagreed transaction that the promoters have entered into."
The select committee on insurance, in its report, had said that the incremental equity should ideally be used for expansion of capital base to strengthen the insurance sector while approving the higher composite FDI limit of 49% from 26%.
The regulator, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Irda), has estimated an additional capital need of .`44,500 crore in the life insurance sector, and Rs 10,500 crore in the non-life insurance sector over the next five years.
Till March 31, 2013, Bajaj Allianz has solvency ratio-size of capital upon all its risk of 6.34, Kotak Life Insurance 5.21 and HDFC Life 2.17, according to the latest report by Irda. The regulator stipulates all insurance companies to maintain solvency ratio of 1.5.
"Any decision to divest stake will be taken by the promoters. Currently, we are adequately capitalised and do not require any funding," said Sandeep Batra, executive director, ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company. ICICI Prudential Life Insurance has a solvency ratio of 3.96.
Small life insurance firms need capital for faster growth in the capital-intensive sector, which has witnessed compounded annual growth of 18.4%, while non-life insurance sector has grown 16.6% in the past 14 years.
"As per the agreement, Standard Life can increase its stake in the company at a fair value," said Vibha Padalkar, chief financial officer and executive director HDFC Life. "Since our's is the first insurance company to have received licence, it is natural progression to list the company, but it is the promoters' call."At present, there are 53 insurance companies operating in India, of which 45 are in the private sector.
Mumbai: The non-life segment will lead the recapitalisation drive in the domestic insurance sector, as the industry as a whole may raise up to Rs. 8,000 crore over the next five years to shore up equity capital, according to a report by Icra.
The rating agency said in Mumbai on Wednesday that it sees general insurers raising more capital as the life sector is already well-capitalised.
"We see capitalisation happening in non-life insurance segment falling in the range of Rs. 4,500 crore to Rs. 8,000 crore over the next five years, led by non-life players," Icra senior vice president and co-head of financial sector for ratings Vibha Batra said.
Private sector non-life insurers would raise capital to maintain their compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) at 15-20 per cent during the next five years. Around 60-70 per cent of this capital infusion should come from foreign partners to increase their solvency ratio from the current minimum requirement of 1.5 per cent to 1.75 per cent in the days to come, she said.
The life insurance sector, which is currently growing at a CAGR of 10-12 per cent, does not require capital infusion.
"However, keeping in view the fact that the country is under-penetrated, we do see some capitalisation happening in the life sector too," she said, adding that this capitalisation would be comparatively more in the traditional policy segment than in unit-linked insurance plans.
The Icra report further said nine life insurers have solvency margins double than that of the regulatory requirement of 1.5 per cent and hence there is no imminent capital requirement for them.
MUMBAI: Insurance companies including New India Assurance, General Insurance Corporation are staring at a hit of Rs 650 crore from a fire that broke out at Mittal-Hindustan Petroleum refinery in Bathinda. The terror attack on the two Mumbai hotels, Taj and Oberoi, in 2011, had led to Rs 500 crore claim. Unlike 2011, when the claim was paid from the terrorism pool, insurers will have to cough up for the damage from the fire.
New India Assurance is the lead insurer with 75 per cent share in the policy. Other insurance companies include United India and SBI General Insurance. India's national reinsurer GIC is the lead reinsurer for the policy. The refinery was insured for Rs 7,500 crore under mega risk policy. A New India Assurance executive said that surveyors are assessing the loss. Such policies cover any loss of profit due to business interruption caused by a shutdown due to fire or natural calamity.
"A claim of around Rs 650 crore is expected from a vapour fire explosion in a plant of HMEL in Bathinda. This is the biggest claim in recent times," said A K Roy, chairman and managing director General Insurance Corporation Re. "We have provided reinsurance and have got protection against it. Our exposure can go up to Rs 100 crore."
A New India Assurance executive added that the company will not have to shell out more than Rs 50 crore. As a mega risk policy with sum assured of more than Rs 2,500 crore at any one location, it is insured under a programme by a number of reinsurance companies.
The fire had broken out in vacuum gas oil treating unit of the refinery. According to media reports, statement issued by the company had said that there was no casualty or injuries of any kind. The policy covers any loss to the property and business interruption. Generally, refineries go for mega risk policies to insure their assets from any casualty, loss of property or business interruption. Oil and Natural Gas CorporationBSE -0.19 % ( ONGCBSE -0.19 %), the largest Indian risk, gets insurance from the London market.
A few years back, the industry had seen a similar case when a fire broke out at a plant of Indian Oil CorporationBSE -0.53 % near Jaipur. The claim, however, was limited to Rs 140 crore. This incident is unlikely to increase the premium cost for firms since the incurred claim ratio under fire has dropped to 68.82 per cent in 2012.13 from 96.78 per cent a year earlier.
So for every Rs 100 premium earned the industry has paid Rs 68 as claim. Though the segment has turned profitable, the non-life insurance industry is still reeling under losses. In 2012-13, underwriting loss-claim paid to premiumearned of the industry was at Rs 6,984 crore.
Read more at: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/42134514.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
IRClass Academy is organised One-day Seminar on Managing the Risk of Wreck Removal Liability on Sat, 13 Sep 2014 at HO of IRS in Powai, Mumbai.
General insurers in India are planning to introduce a "base rate" system to price premium rates. The move is expected to arrest the rise in underwriting losses in the face of intense competition.
The General Insurance Council, which represents non-life insurance companies, discussed the idea last month at a meeting attended by the heads of New India Assurance, GIC Re, ICICI Lombard, HDFC Ergo and Tata AIG General Insurance, reported the Press Trust of India.
“We are in discussions to standardise best practices in underwriting property and health risks,” General Insurance Council secretary general, Mr R Chandrasekaran, said. He added that the move is to ensure that the risk is properly evaluated by general insurers and taken into account in pricing.
New India Assurance chairman and managing director , Mr G Srinivasan, said: “There is a feeling that premium rates in the domestic market are on the low side. Insurers have been discussing for some time how to ensure that the rates are at the right level and that there is some semblance of uniformity.
“At the July meeting, we had discussed how to bring the rates to the right level across the sectors, including health, motor and fire & engineering.”
“The Insurance Information Bureau is already trying to do it in the fire segment. Along similar lines, we want to have some kind of technical rates in the industry,” he added.
Fixing minimum rates could take insurers back to pre-2007 when tariffs were in force. Insurers have been slashing premium rates since 2007 when the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) removed its fixed-tariff system for all business lines except for third-party motor insurance. De-tariffing allows insurers to price their products freely.
The growth prospects in Malaysian insurance will continue to attract more foreign investors as market liberalisation approaches. Tightened regulations could also lead to more capital-pressured insurers to merge or divest insurance arms with poor economies of scale, according to Fitch Ratings.
Some M&A transactions have already occurred in 1H14, and Fitch Ratings expects more consolidation to follow in the second half of the year, according to the international rating agency's report entitled “Malaysia Insurance Market Dashboard 1H14”.
Fitch views the industry’s capital strength as solid, as insurers tend to maintain risk-based capital (RBC) ratios in excess of their own individual target capital level (ITCL). Malaysian insurers are required to determine ITCL that is commensurate with their own risk profiles. Fitch expects this industry RBC trend to be well-sustained, supported by insurers’ ongoing surplus growth and the adoption of the RBC framework for the takaful sector in 2014.
Favourable underwriting margins in fire and other non-motor classes are likely to persist, and will cushion underwriting volatility from the motor class – caused mainly by adverse claims from third-party bodily injury and death (TPBID). The motor tariff hike in February 2014 is another step towards deregulation by 2016, but is insufficient for motor insurers to break even in TPBID. The combined ratio for the entire motor class stood at 103% in 2013, and Fitch believes motor profitability could only be achieved when premium rates are fully deregulated.
The life sector will continue to post stable underwriting performance. The strong demand for investment-linked products, underpinned by rising consumers’ risk appetite, will offset pressure from lower sales in traditional life products.
Fitch expects steady growth in the general insurance sector, as higher private consumption will continue to fuel demand for personal line products. Growth in the life sector is also expected to be stable in the medium to long term, as a rising middle-income population will drive higher demand for wealth accumulation and health protection products. The agency force and growing bancassurance channel will continue to support the life sector.
Premium growth prospects for the takaful sector are likely to remain positive, as general and family takaful operators continue to broaden their distribution coverage and product offerings.
Separately, RAM Rating Services of which Fitch is a shareholder, said that Malaysia’s insurance and takaful sector has evolved significantly in the last five years.
“The liberalisation of the Malaysian financial sector in 2009 – which allowed higher foreign equity (from 49% to 70%) in investment banks, Islamic banks and insurance/takaful companies and the issuance of additional licences – paved the way for greater foreign participation in local insurance companies.
“At the same time, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) introduced a host of regulatory changes – starting with a new risk-based capital framework for conventional insurers in 2009 (and for takaful operators in 2014) plus various other operating guidelines for both general and life insurance/family takaful businesses to enhance the industry’s financial soundness, efficiency and consumer protection,” explained RAM Rating.
In addition, under new legislation, composite insurers and takaful operators are required to legally separate their general and life/family businesses by 2018.
RAM Ratings pointed out, “All these developments, starting with the sector’s liberalisation, have sparked a wave of mergers and acquisitions in the insurance industry, thus paving the way for greater competition, if not more challenging times ahead, for incumbents."
Between 2010 and June 2014, it said the Malaysian insurance industry saw the conclusion of 17 M&A deals valued at about MYR15 billion (US$4.7 billion), notably in the more fragmented general insurance segment.
The wreck of the Costa Concordia arrives at port of Genoa Pra-Voltri towed by several tugboats.
Costa Concordia has been handed over to the team responsible for its breaking and recycling after being safely docked in the port of Genoa yesterday afternoon.
Ownership of the vessel was transferred in mid-afternoon from Costa Crociere to Italian engineering group Saipem and Genoa ship repairer San Giorgio del Porto for the start of a recycling operation that is expected to take 22 months.
Italian prime minister Matteo Renzi was in Genoa to follow the docking of the ship at a specially prepared berth close to the port's Voltri Terminal Europa.
He praised those involved "for getting something done which everyone said would be impossible".
The wrecked cruise ship and its accompanying convoy left the island of Giglio on Wednesday.
It deliberately slowed down on the last leg of the journey so as to arrive off Genoa in the early hours of Sunday as planned.
The final approach to the port began at 05.00. Shortly afterwards, Genoese pilots boarded the disabled cruise ship to prepare it to enter port.
Before the entry manoeuvres began, Costa Crociere chief executive Michael Thamm went aboard to personally thank senior salvage master Nick Sloane and the Titan Micoperi salvage team for their work in recovering the vessel.
A little before 11 00, harbour tug Messico took over from seagoing tug ITC Blizzard to take Costa Concordia into port.
The majority of the loss stemming from the crash of Malaysia Airlines flight MH-17 will be absorbed by the Lloyd’s market as well as some global re/insurers, according to AM Best.
In the briefing, the rating agency said that it does not expect to take any rating actions in response to the loss given the diversified nature of business underwritten by the entities involved. The total insurance loss will comprise passenger liability claims and physical damage to the aircraft. Passenger liability claims will be covered as part of aviation all risks policies.
Allianz SE, through its specialty lines subsidiary, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, is the lead reinsurer on aviation hull and liability risks for Malaysia Airlines.
“As an industry leader in the global aviation market, the Lloyd’s market is also likely to be affected by passenger liability claims, as will a number of global reinsurers. Due to the nature of the loss, a complex and lengthy settlement period is anticipated,” said the rating agency.
According to recent reports, the aircraft is valued at approximately $97 million. Atrium Syndicate 609 has confirmed that it is the leader of the hull war policy for Malaysia Airlines. The syndicate and its co-insurers have agreed to settle the hull war aspect of the loss and collection of funds has been instigated.
AM Best said: “However, the agreement to settle is on the basis that the early assumption regarding the key facts remains correct: i.e., that the plane was shot down and it is the insurers that wrote the airline’s hull war policy, rather than its all risks policy, that are liable.”
The rating agency also added that three consecutive large losses this year - the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH-370, hull losses due to fighting at Tripoli airportand the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH-17 – should now halt the decline in aviation rates. But increases will be constrained by the high level of capacity serving the market.
Lloyd's, Europe, Malaysia Airlines, AM Best, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, Atrium, Asia-Pacific
Airline insurers are reviewing cover for aircraft involved in hostile acts such as the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 as the industry faces its most expensive year since the 9/11 attacks in 2001 with annual losses set to pass $2 billion.
Senior insurance brokers have warned that some underwriters are demanding more than threefold increases in premiums in recent days for so-called "war" insurance policies.
Some insurance companies want details of exact flight paths and are considering withdrawing completely from providing certain types of cover for flights over hotspots in the Middle East and parts of Africa, the brokers added.
Read MoreMalaysia Airlines hit by flight cancellations
Fear of soaring claims for airline war policies comes in the wake of recent fighting at Tripoli airport in Libya, which damaged almost two dozen planes, as well as the MH17 disaster, which killed 298. Payouts on war insurance policies alone are expected to reach several hundred million dollars this year.
Airlines are vulnerable to abrupt changes in policy terms of war insurance, which covers physical damage to aircraft from hostile acts. Such policies can be cancelled with just seven days notice.
On top of war insurance, airlines spend several times more in premiums – typically amounting to millions of dollars each for major airlines – on separate coverage known as "all-risk" policies. These policies are likely to see a rise in premiums but nothing like the increase expected for war insurance.
Read MoreDutch mourn first MH17 bodies flown to Netherlands
Malaysia Airlines is likely to face higher-than-average increases, brokers said, especially given the MH17 disaster struck little more than four months after the disappearance of another of its jets.
Besides the Malaysian disasters, plane crashes last week in Mali and Taiwan will also contribute to insurers' losses. All-risk policies cover liability claims, compensation payments to passengers, legal fees and physical damage to aircraft not caused by hostile acts.
Higher premiums would reverse successive years of lower insurance costs for airlines, with premiums almost halving over the past five years, according to brokers, due to a relative absence of losses.
More from the Financial Times:
Images show Russian attacks, says USBokoHaram kidnaps wife of Cameroon politicianSankaty pays $1bn for JPMorgan debt
Aviation war insurers including the Lloyd's of London market are facing an annual bill this year several times bigger than their premium income, which totals only about $60 million.
Although some premiums have already risen sharply, however, brokers say they expect most airlines to continue securing insurance with underwriters prepared to fill any gaps in coverage. Lancashire, the Lloyd's insurer, said last week it was planning to take advantage of an expected rise in premium levels.
Brokers expect both liability claims and hull losses to run into several hundred million dollars this year. Attritional losses – caused by more regular damage, such as bird strikes – typically come to about $600 million annually. This would push the total losses for 2014 past $2 billion.
Read MoreUkraine fighting complicates MH17 crash probe
However, the total costs remain uncertain because while physical damage losses can be settled quickly, the liability bill can take several years to finalize.
Compensation paid to relatives depend on several factors, such as the nationalities of passengers and their earnings potential. A relatively small number of Americans killed in the recent disasters should cap the losses.
Malaysia Airlines's (MAS) US$2.25-billion overall liability policy is mysteriously missing a standard clause that usually limits insurers' payments for search-and-rescue costs.
MAS’s policy has a high cap by industry standards — US$2.25 billion for each crash — because the carrier operates big Airbus A380s, each configured for 494 passengers, and it wanted ample coverage, reported the New York Times.
But the policy is unusual in that it does not have a separate limit for search-and-rescue costs — it is limited only by the overall US$2.25 billion cap for the policy, three people with knowledge of the policy said. It is unclear why the clause was omitted, they said.
The absence of a separate limit for search-and-rescue costs means that MAS could seek reimbursement for tens of millions — and potentially hundreds of millions — of dollars in search costs if the Malaysian and Australian governments decide to bill the airline for even part of their considerable expenses in looking for Flight MH370, which vanished on 8 March.
An Australian delegation has been sent to Malaysia to broach the question of sharing costs for the Flight 370 investigation and seeking insurance reimbursement, said people with knowledge of the visit and the insurance policy, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
By tradition, governments do not seek reimbursement from an airline for search-and-rescue costs. As a result, the airlines do not typically need to ask their insurers to cover these costs; the insurers cover only so-called commercial costs, though their contracts do allow governments to seek reimbursement.
In the case of Flight 370, the Australian government is paying A$8 million (US$7.5 million), to commercial contractors for a survey of the floor of the Indian Ocean, and has set aside another A$60 million to hire a contractor to tow deep-sea submersibles across 60,000 square km of the ocean floor to look for the missing plane.
Australian officials, Malaysian officials and the lead underwriter of the broad liability policy, Allianz of Germany, all declined to comment, as did the broker who negotiated the insurance policy on Malaysia Airlines’ behalf, the London-based Willis Group Holdings.